-
-
-
-
EMC Test System For Civil Products
-
- Electrostatic Discharge Immunity
- Radiated, radio-frequency,electromagnetic field immunity
- Electrical Fast Transient Burst Immunity
- Surge immunity
- Immunity To Conducted Disturbance Induced by Radio Frequency Field
- Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity
- Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations immunity
- Harmonics and interharmonics including mains signalling at AC power port, low frequency immunity
- Voltage Fluctuation Immunity Test
- Common mode disturbances in the frequency range 0 Hz to 150 kHz Immunity
- Ripple on DC input power port immunity
- Three-phase Voltage Unbalance Immunity Test
- Power Frequency Variation Immunity Test
- Oscillatory Wave Immunity Test
- Damped Oscillatory Magnetic Field Immunity Test
- Differential mode disturbances immunity test
- DC power input port voltage dip, short interruption and voltage variations test
-
Automotive Electronic EMC Test System
-
- Electrostatic Discharge Immunity
- Electrical Transient Conducted Immunity
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Anechoic Chamber Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Transverse Wave (TEM) Cell Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-large Current injection (BCI) method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Stripline Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-direct Injection Of Radio Frequency (RF) Power
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Magnetic Field Immunity Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Portable Transmitter Simulation Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Conduction Immunity Method For Extended Audio Range
- High Voltage Electrical Performance ISO 21498-2 Test System
- High Voltage Transient Conducted Immunity (ISO 7637-4)
-
-
- CE101(25Hz ~ 10kHz power line conduction emission)
- CE102(10kHz ~ 10MHz power line conduction emission)
- CE106(10kHz ~ 40GHz antenna port conducted emission)
- CE107 (Power Line Spike (Time Domain) Conducted Emission)
- RE101(25Hz ~ 100kHz magnetic field radiation emission)
- RE102(10kHz ~ 18GHz electric field radiation emission)
- RE103(10kHz ~ 40GHz antenna harmonic and spurious output radiated emission)
-
- CS101(25Hz ~ 150kHz power line conduction sensitivity)
- CS102(25Hz ~ 50kHz ground wire conduction sensitivity)
- CS103(15kHz ~ 10GHz Antenna Port Intermodulation Conducted Sensitivity)
- CS104(25Hz ~ 20GHz antenna port unwanted signal suppression conduction sensitivity)
- CS105(25Hz ~ 20GHz antenna port intermodulation conduction sensitivity)
- CS106 (Power Line Spike Signal Conduction Sensitivity)
- CS109(50Hz ~ 100kHz shell current conduction sensitivity)
- CS112 (Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity)
- CS114(4kHz ~ 400MHz cable bundle injection conduction sensitivity)
- CS115 (Conduction sensitivity of cable bundle injection pulse excitation)
- CS116(10kHz to 100MHz Cable and Power Line Damped Sinusoidal Transient Conduction Sensitivity)
- RS101(25Hz ~ 100kHz magnetic field radiation sensitivity)
- RS103(10kHz ~ 40GHz electric field radiation sensitivity)
- RS105 (Transient Electromagnetic Field Radiated Susceptibility)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EMC Test System For Civil Products
-
- Electrostatic Discharge Immunity
- Radiated, radio-frequency,electromagnetic field immunity
- Electrical Fast Transient Burst Immunity
- Surge immunity
- Immunity To Conducted Disturbance Induced by Radio Frequency Field
- Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity
- Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations immunity
- Harmonics and interharmonics including mains signalling at AC power port, low frequency immunity
- Voltage Fluctuation Immunity Test
- Common mode disturbances in the frequency range 0 Hz to 150 kHz Immunity
- Ripple on DC input power port immunity
- Three-phase Voltage Unbalance Immunity Test
- Power Frequency Variation Immunity Test
- Oscillatory Wave Immunity Test
- Damped Oscillatory Magnetic Field Immunity Test
- Differential mode disturbances immunity test
- DC power input port voltage dip, short interruption and voltage variations test
-
Automotive Electronic EMC Test System
-
- Electrostatic Discharge Immunity
- Electrical Transient Conducted Immunity
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Anechoic Chamber Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Transverse Wave (TEM) Cell Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-large Current injection (BCI) method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Stripline Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-direct Injection Of Radio Frequency (RF) Power
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Magnetic Field Immunity Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Portable Transmitter Simulation Method
- Immunity Test To Narrowband Radiated Electromagnetic Energy-Conduction Immunity Method For Extended Audio Range
- High Voltage Electrical Performance ISO 21498-2 Test System
- High Voltage Transient Conducted Immunity (ISO 7637-4)
-
-
- CE101(25Hz ~ 10kHz power line conduction emission)
- CE102(10kHz ~ 10MHz power line conduction emission)
- CE106(10kHz ~ 40GHz antenna port conducted emission)
- CE107 (Power Line Spike (Time Domain) Conducted Emission)
- RE101(25Hz ~ 100kHz magnetic field radiation emission)
- RE102(10kHz ~ 18GHz electric field radiation emission)
- RE103(10kHz ~ 40GHz antenna harmonic and spurious output radiated emission)
-
- CS101(25Hz ~ 150kHz power line conduction sensitivity)
- CS102(25Hz ~ 50kHz ground wire conduction sensitivity)
- CS103(15kHz ~ 10GHz Antenna Port Intermodulation Conducted Sensitivity)
- CS104(25Hz ~ 20GHz antenna port unwanted signal suppression conduction sensitivity)
- CS105(25Hz ~ 20GHz antenna port intermodulation conduction sensitivity)
- CS106 (Power Line Spike Signal Conduction Sensitivity)
- CS109(50Hz ~ 100kHz shell current conduction sensitivity)
- CS112 (Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity)
- CS114(4kHz ~ 400MHz cable bundle injection conduction sensitivity)
- CS115 (Conduction sensitivity of cable bundle injection pulse excitation)
- CS116(10kHz to 100MHz Cable and Power Line Damped Sinusoidal Transient Conduction Sensitivity)
- RS101(25Hz ~ 100kHz magnetic field radiation sensitivity)
- RS103(10kHz ~ 40GHz electric field radiation sensitivity)
- RS105 (Transient Electromagnetic Field Radiated Susceptibility)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Technical column
CASES
Effect of test table on measurement of radiation disturbance
Release time:
2016-12-28 00:00
Source:
Abstract: The influence of the test table on the radiation disturbance test was studied experimentally, and the causes and solutions of the differences in test data were found. The experimental results show that the testing table with low dielectric constant should be used to reduce the uncertainty. The research has certain reference value and guiding significance for the measurement of radiation disturbance in electromagnetic compatibility test.
Key words: radiation disturbance; Normalized field attenuation; Dielectric constant
Introduction
With the popularization and implementation of electromagnetic compatibility standards, people pay more and more attention to the electromagnetic compatibility of products. Major electronic equipment manufacturers also pay more and more attention to the electromagnetic compatibility test of products, especially whether the electromagnetic radiation harassment meets the relevant standards. In the radiation disturbance test, the influence of the site on the test results is very obvious. In different test sites, the same instrument will get different measurement results, so there are differences in the test data of each darkroom. EN55022:2010 is a European test standard designed to provide uniform requirements for radio disturbance levels of information technology equipment within applicable areas, specifying disturbance limits, measurement methods, operating conditions and processing requirements for results. For EN 55022:2010 radiation harassment tests, bench devices are required to be placed on non-metallic tables, as shown in Figure 1. The standard only mentions that the size of the table is usually 1.5m×1.0m, and the material of the test table is not specified. Due to the different dielectric constants of the test tables made of different materials, the results of radiation disturbance test are different. In this paper, the influence of the test table on the measurement of radiation disturbance is quantitatively analyzed.

1. Influence of test table on site performance
EN 55022:2010 requires that radiation disturbance tests be conducted in an open test area. The open test site should be flat, free of overhead power lines, free of nearby reflectors and large enough to allow the antenna to be placed at the specified distance and with sufficient spacing between the antenna, the equipment under test and the reflected object. However, with the development of society, it is very difficult to find an ideal site that meets the requirements, so the anechoic chamber is widely used as an alternative site for open test sites. According to the standard, normalized field attenuation (NSA) is a key indicator of whether the anechoic chamber can achieve effective results. The anechoic chamber is built to simulate an open test site, and the difference between the normalized field attenuation of the anechoic chamber and the open field should be less than 4dB to demonstrate the degree of similarity between the two.
The normalized field attenuation test method was adopted to verify the influence of the test table on the test results, as shown in Figure 2.
In a 10m darkroom without a test table, a signal source is used to transmit electromagnetic waves through a double-cone antenna (frequency 30~250MHz) and a logarithmic antenna (frequency 250~1000MHz) respectively. A set of field attenuation data is measured using a receiver and another set of biconical and logarithmic antennas. Normalized site attenuation calculation formula:
AN = VT-VR-AFT-AFR-ΔAFTOT
Where: VT -- input voltage of transmitting antenna, dBμV; VR -- receiving antenna output voltage, dBμV; AFT -- antenna coefficient of transmitting antenna, dB; AFR -- antenna factor of receiving antenna, dB; ΔAFTOT -- mutual impedance correction coefficient, dB(only for dipole antenna measurements at distances of 3 m, other than ΔAFTOT = 0)
Table 1. Field attenuation measured by bicone antenna and logarithmic antenna

In Table 1, Aideal is the standard normalized site attenuation value, and the deviation is Aideal minus AN, both of which are less than 4 dB. Then, the other two groups of site attenuation data were measured respectively in the case of foam table and wooden table, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.


Figure 3. One of the measurements of foam table site attenuation data Figure 4. One of the attenuation data measurements of the wooden table site
The three groups of site attenuation data were compared, as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5 Comparison of site attenuation data 1
2. Analysis of the influence of test table on the measurement results of radiation disturbance test
Now the same signal source is placed on the foam table (as shown in Figure 6) and the wooden table (as shown in Figure 7) respectively, and the receiving antenna measures the radiation disturbance at the distance of 10 m from the signal source.


FIG. 6 Foam table site attenuation data measurement II Figure 7 Attenuation data measurement of wooden table site II
The test results are shown in Figure 8.

FIG. 8 Comparison of site attenuation data II
As can be seen from Figure 8, there is a great difference in the radiation disturbance test results in the frequency range of 700~900 MHz, and the difference at 800 MHz reaches 5.3dB. However, in GB/T 6113.402-2006, Part 4-2 of the Specification for Measuring Equipment and Methods of Radio Disturbance and Immunity: Uncertainty, Statistics, and Limit Modeling Uncertainty of Measuring Equipment and Facilities mentioned that the maximum allowable uncertainty value of radiation disturbance measurement is 5.2 dB. It can be seen that the difference of radiation disturbance caused by different material test tables exceeds the uncertainty specified in the standard.
3 Conclusion
It is not difficult to see from FIG. 5 and FIG. 8 that the frequency of maximum difference between test tables of different materials is the same, which is between 700MHz and 900MHz.
According to the above formula for calculating normalized field attenuation, it can be concluded that:
VR = VT-AFT-AFR-ΔAFTOT-AN
Because the dielectric constant of foam is close to air and smaller than that of wood, the site attenuation data measured with foam table in dark room is similar to that without test table. When wooden tables are used in dark room, there is a great difference between the measured site attenuation data and that without test tables. Due to the large dielectric constant of the wooden table, the attenuation of AN in the dark room field using the wooden table in FIG. 5 is relatively large. Under the condition that AFT, AFR and ΔAFTOT remain unchanged, the maximum measurement level value VR measured by the receiver will decrease.
Therefore, when auxiliary facilities such as wooden tables or test tables made of large dielectric constant materials are used in the radio anthems, AN attenuation of the site will increase, resulting in a decrease in the intensity of the electric field measured by the receiver, resulting in differences in test results. Auxiliary equipment such as test table is an integral part of the effectiveness of the test site. Therefore, it is suggested that materials with small dielectric constant should be selected when selecting auxiliary facilities in the dark room, and the site attenuation should be measured and compared to ensure the consistency of measurement results in each dark room.